StatCounter

Friday, November 17, 2017

It's better to have loved and lost... and the supporting math.

Not all aphorisms are created equally.

Some aphorisms seem viable only until scrutinized.  Take for example the old chestnut, "Don't take any wooden nickels."

Your knee-jerk reaction may be, "No, never take a wooden nickel. It's counterfeit and effectively useless as currency."

But when you further consider the concept of a wooden nickel, the following thoughts may ensue, "I wonder what a wooden nickel looks like? I think a wooden nickel would be a wonderful novelty.  I could play tricks on my friends. I would gladly pay fifty cents for a wooden nickel."  Surely you would now forgo the real nickel to take the wooden one in its stead.  "Don't take any wooden nickels" is now bad advice.

Likewise, "I'm a glass half-full kind of guy." Really?  A glass half full means you were unable to fill it completely.  You don't have enough beverage! A glass half empty was once full, now partially consumed.  We have lots of beverage!

Then there's the concept of, "It's better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all." Even with further consideration, it's hard to tell if this claim holds true.  How would you know if loving and losing is greater than not loving at all?  There is a direct relationship between loving in losing.  When you increase love, the pain of loss increases in kind.

If we set never having loved equal to zero, we must determine if Love minus Loss is greater than zero. But how do you measure Love?  Love is the sum of intangibles experienced during a lifetime, however short.

Love is remembering when you were young as we were headed back to the house.  I called for you but you stopped, looked at me, then turned and did a running belly flop into the seasonal stream running next to the house.  There was such joy in your wet face.

It was your love for all other animals.  How when it was clear Cookie was spending her last night on Earth, you laid by her side all night so she wasn’t alone. It was when Jelly was a puppy who could fit in the palm of my hand, you doted on him and made him feel welcomed. It was your look of hurt when a dog or cat or bird showed you hostility, a reaction alien to your nature.

It was your virtue. It was how after losing your patience with the other dogs, you would later apologize with a lick to the head. How we could communicate with just a look into each other’s eyes.  How you took responsibility for securing the property, with your morning "walkabout" the grounds.

It was how you scared the daylights out of strangers, only because they didn't know the big baby you really were. How you would take things from my pocket, or steal the cat's bed, or horse toys, just for the attention.

It was your look that told me you couldn't fight the cancer anymore and it was time to say goodnight.  It was us holding you on your last moments on Earth, so you weren’t alone.

Can we put that into a mathematical formula?



 We can try.

Love equals virtue to the power of the intangibles.

L=Vi  






 Levi            

Search This Mess